Learn
Design references usually write an aesthetic up as a confident paragraph. The confidence is the problem: it hides which parts are the movement's own rules, which are period habits, and which the writer made up to fill a gap.
This one keeps those apart on the page. It costs us the smooth read. What you get back is a reference you can build from without guessing which sentences will hold.
Visual language 101
What is a visual language?
A set of rules for how something looks, together with the argument those rules are making and the things they refuse. The refusals matter as much as the requirements: Swiss Style is identified less by using a grid — everyone uses a grid — than by declining to add a second signalling device once the grid is there.
Grid, and nothing else
Section
Die Neue Grafik
Hierarchy comes from position, weight and interval.
A second column sits on the same flowline.
One signalling device doing all the work.
Grid, plus a second device
Section
Die Neue Grafik
Hierarchy comes from position, weight and interval.
A second column sits on the same flowline.
Still on the grid. No longer Swiss.
Aesthetic, style, movement, technique
These are different kinds of thing. A movement was formed by people who argued about it. A technique is a production method that leaves marks. A visual world belongs to a piece of fiction. A mood is a register several languages can reach.
This corpus cannot currently tell them apart. Every record is typed as a visual language. Distinguishing the kinds is an open question, not a distinction we are hiding.
How visual languages combine
Badly, if you are not careful, because two languages can legislate the same area in incompatible ways. Swiss Style forbids ranking by size alone; another language may require it. Combining them means deciding which rule wins, and that decision is not in the corpus. Mix shows the collision rather than resolving it.
How to communicate visual direction
The practical tool this project offers is the distinction between kinds of claim. “Use a neutral grotesque” is a constraint the language requires. “Four to twelve columns” is our operationalisation. Saying which one you mean is most of the work — a brief that mixes them produces a design that satisfies nobody, because nobody could tell which parts were negotiable.
Kinds of claim
Every rule carries a label for what kind of claim it is and how it is established. A designer should be able to ask “is this part of the aesthetic, or your recommendation?” and get an answer without reading a footnote.
Neue Grafik
Die Neue
Grafik
Hierarchy comes from position, weight and interval. Nothing on this page is ranked by size alone, and nothing is ranked by colour alone.
Rules separate grid fields. They are never decorative, and there is no second signalling device once the grid is doing the work.
1
Build a module matrix: columns crossed by horizontal flowlines. Every element occupies whole modules.
Necessary · our ranking
2
Use very few distinct sizes and very few weights in one composition.
Documented · Source not yet verified
3
45 to 75 characters per line.
Not part of the aesthetic
4
Zero. No rounding on any element.
Our reading
Swiss Style, rendered from its own record. Four of its rules, one of each kind of claim.
Documented
A source states it, and the source is attached to the claim.
Seen in the work
Observed in real artefacts that someone inspected.
Graded by our research brief · No source attached
A research brief graded this documented, but no source is attached yet. A grade is not a source.
From our catalogue entry
Carried over from Aesthetary's original catalogue entry. The reasoning behind it was never recorded.
Our reading
Aesthetary's conclusion from the material. No single source says it.
Web translation
How Aesthetary applies the language on screen. Not something the aesthetic itself specified.
Not part of the aesthetic
An accessibility floor or general current practice that would apply to any build.
Necessary · our ranking
Necessary (remove it and it is not this) · Strong · Common (occurs often; defines nothing) · Optional · Unreliable (can occur; does not define it). Where Aesthetary set the tier, the strength carries “our ranking”.
Modern good practice
Not part of the aesthetic. It is current practice or an accessibility standard, and would apply to any build.
Our reading
Aesthetary supplied this. The source says nothing so precise. A starting point, not a fact.
Done in period practice
Recorded as period practice; how that was established is still being resolved. A defensible default, not a requirement.
How it is evidenced
A second, separate label: how the claim is established. The kind of claim never stands in for it.
- Graded by our research brief · No source attached
- A research brief graded this documented, but no source is attached yet. A grade is not a source.
- From our catalogue entry
- Stated in Aesthetary’s existing catalogue entry. An outside source is named only where one is linked to the claim.
- Our reading
- Aesthetary’s conclusion from the material. No single source says it.
- Not researched yet
- No research has been done here. An unresearched area is not permission and not a blank to fill in.
- No grade recorded
- The record holds no evidence grade for this. It is not our decision and not an outside source; the record simply does not say.
Where a rule’s kind already says how it is established (From our catalogue entry; Graded by our research brief · No source attached; Documented), browsing pages print only that. Other rules add the evidence where it is missing or where nobody has researched the area, and mark any claim with an outside source linked to it. Agent guides always print both.
The twelve areas
Every Aesthetic is described in the same twelve areas, and every surface means the same thing by each: Color on Mix is Color on Build and on this page. Ten of them carry an overall position, so two questions get asked about each and answered separately: does something have to be here, and if it is, does the language say how to handle it? Hierarchy and Density are researched as dimensions and hold rules, but have no overall position of their own.
- Layout
- How the surface is divided and what governs where things sit.
- Typography
- Letterforms, their roles, and how text is set.
- Color
- How many colors do work here, and what each is for.
- Imagery
- Photography, illustration and what pictures are allowed to do.
- Surface
- Texture, material and grain — what the page is made of.
- Interface
- Elevation, radius, borders: the handling of interface parts.
- Motion
- Movement, transition and timing.
- Motif
- Repeating decorative marks and ornament systems.
- Technique
- The production method the look depends on.
- Form
- Three-dimensional organisation, where a language has one.
- Hierarchy
- What ranks first, and by what means: size, weight, colour, position.
- Density
- How full the surface is, and how much rest it allows.
Some rules describe the Aesthetic rather than a part of its design: where it comes from, what it is called. Those are Context, shown apart and never scored. A few rule areas do not yet map to one of the twelve and are shown under their own name.
The distinction that does the most work is the last one in the key. “The language lets you choose” and “nobody has looked into it” read the same in a normal write-up, and they are opposite instructions. Silence never becomes permission here.
86 of 730 positions recorded — 12% of the questions this product asks have an answer in it.
Layout9
Typography9
Color9
Imagery9
Surface9
Interface7
Motion9
Motif8
Technique8
Form9
Bauhaus 10/10Developer Dark 10/10Fashion Editorial 10/10Internetcore 10/10Modern SaaS 10/10Quiet Luxury 10/10Swiss Style 10/10Manga 9/10Retrofuturism 7/10— the only nine columns with anything in them. Every other column is a record nobody has read against these areas.
- 57Partly sourcedAt least one claim has a source attached. The rest are graded by our research brief, carried over from our catalogue entry, or our reading, each labelled where it appears.
- 11Graded, not yet sourcedA research brief graded some claims documented, but no source is attached yet. A grade is not a source.
- 5Not yet researchedNo source attached, and nothing graded by a research brief.
Ordered by how much reading has been done, left to right. Depth describes our research, not the aesthetic. A thinly documented language is not a lesser one. Circus is not a lesser aesthetic than Swiss Style; the column is empty because nobody has opened a source on it. 64 records have no recorded position on any area.
Core, and specified The language is not itself without this, and there are rules for how to do it.
Open Use it or do not, and handle it how you like. The freedom is asserted, not assumed.
Not established No one has researched it yet. That is not permission — treat it as an open question, not a free hand.
Excluded The language rules this out. Adding it means you are building something else.
Outside this language The slot does not apply here. This is not a gap in our research.
Nothing recorded This language has no recorded position on this. Absence is not permission — nobody has looked.
Writing systems
A rule like “set it vertically, read right to left” belongs to Japanese, not to manga. Carry it into an English-language build and you have not implemented the aesthetic; you have mangled a writing system.
Rule applied without its script
The panel on the right is read first.
“Set it vertically, read right to left.” The rule is true. It is true of Japanese, and nothing in the sentence says so.
Rule scoped, and withheld
The panel on the right is read first.
Marked script: Japanese, the rule never reaches a Latin build. The Element that carries panel order is held back from the build instructions entirely, because the Element has no way to record which script it means.
So rules can be scoped to a script. Where a rule has no script recorded, this site says exactly that. No writing system recorded. That does not mean Latin — it means nobody has established which script this describes.
A gap we have not closed
Since V2.3 an Element can record which writing system its reading order belongs to, and since V2.5 it can record that someone checked and the direction belongs to none. Either way the instruction is handed over carrying what was established. Where neither is recorded, the product withholds it from build guidance and shows it as an open decision — and an unrecorded left-to-right counts exactly as an unrecorded right-to-left. Manga's page shows this working: the right-to-left rules are marked Japanese, and the Element that carries panel order is held back from the build instructions, because the Element has no way to record which script it means.
Vocabulary
The words for seeing and reasoning about visual languages, exactly as the product uses them.
The words the product uses
- Visual language
- A way of making things look a particular way, with rules you can state. The thing Aesthetary studies.
- Aesthetic
- What the catalogue calls a visual language when you are browsing it.
- Element
- One part a look is built from: a grid, a palette, a printing process, a way of moving. Aesthetics share Elements.
- Aesthetic page
- A page set in the language itself, so you see the rules working rather than read about them.
- Recipe
- A saved combination of Aesthetics and Elements, with the decisions that hold it together.
The parts of a visual language
- Layout
- How the surface is divided and what governs where things sit.
- Typography
- Letterforms, their roles, and how text is set.
- Color
- How many colors do work here, and what each is for.
- Imagery
- Photography, illustration and what pictures are allowed to do.
- Surface
- Texture, material and grain — what the page is made of.
- Interface
- Elevation, radius, borders: the handling of interface parts.
- Motion
- Movement, transition and timing.
- Motif
- Repeating decorative marks and ornament systems.
- Technique
- The production method the look depends on.
- Form
- Three-dimensional organisation, where a language has one.
What kind of claim a rule is
- Documented
- A source states it, and the source is attached to the claim.
- Seen in the work
- Observed in real artefacts that someone inspected.
- Graded by our research brief · No source attached
- A research brief graded this documented, but no source is attached yet. A grade is not a source.
- From our catalogue entry
- Carried over from Aesthetary's original catalogue entry. The reasoning behind it was never recorded.
- Our reading
- Aesthetary's conclusion from the material. No single source says it.
- Web translation
- How Aesthetary applies the language on screen. Not something the aesthetic itself specified.
- Not part of the aesthetic
- An accessibility floor or general current practice that would apply to any build.
- Necessary · our ranking
- Necessary (remove it and it is not this) · Strong · Common (occurs often; defines nothing) · Optional · Unreliable (can occur; does not define it). Where Aesthetary set the tier, the strength carries “our ranking”.
- Modern good practice
- Not part of the aesthetic. It is current practice or an accessibility standard, and would apply to any build.
- Our reading
- Aesthetary supplied this. The source says nothing so precise. A starting point, not a fact.
- Done in period practice
- Recorded as period practice; how that was established is still being resolved. A defensible default, not a requirement.
How much a part tells you
- Tells you it is this
- Remove it and a reader would no longer recognise the language.
- Typical
- Usual, and variable. Its presence alone identifies nothing.
- Compatible
- Sits with the language without belonging to it.
- How strongly
- How strongly the language expresses this Element.
- How telling
- How much seeing it tells you that you are looking at this language, and not something else.
Where a name comes from
- Attested
- The name is used in the field by the people who practise it.
- Constructed
- The name is ours. The look is real and widespread; nobody in the field calls it this.
- Contested
- The name is disputed.
Origins: Market convention · From a movement · From a scene · From a genre · From a technique · From a tradition · Sector register